Ur-Nammu
He was a mighty
hunter before the Lord: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter
before the Lord.
Ur-Nammu
dedication tablet
for the Temple of Inanna in Uruk.[3] Inscription "For his lady Inanna,
Ur-Nammu the mighty man, King of Ur and King of Sumer and
Akkad":
ππΉ
Dinanna Dinanna.... "For
Inanna-"
ππππΎ
Nin-e-an-na... Nin-e-an-na.... "Ninanna,"
πππ
NIN-a-ni. NIN-a-ni.... "his Lady"
π¨ππ
UR-NAMMU.... "Ur-Nammu"
πππ΅NITAH
KALAG ga.... "the mighty man"
ππππ π
LUGAL URIM KI ma.... "King of Ur"
ππ πππ π΅π€ LUGAL ki en gi ki URI ke.... "King of
Sumer and Akkad"
Ur-Nammu (or
Ur-Namma, Ur-Engur, Ur-Gur, Sumerian: π¨ππ, ruled c. 2112
BC – 2095 BC middle chronology, or possibly ca. 2047-2030 BC short chronology)
founded the Sumerian Third Dynasty of Ur, in southern
Mesopotamia, following several centuries of Akkadian and Gutian rule.
His main achievement
was state-building, and Ur-Nammu is chiefly remembered today for his
legal code, the Code of Ur-Nammu, the oldest known surviving example in
the world.
He held the titles
of "King of Ur, and King of Sumer and Akkad".
Contents
• 1Reign
• 2See also
• 3Notes
• 4External links
Reign[edit]
According to the
Sumerian King List, Ur-Nammu reigned for 18 years.[4] Year-names are known for
17 of these years, but their order is uncertain. One year-name of his reign
records the devastation of Gutium , while two years seem to commemorate his
legal reforms ("Year in which Ur-Nammu the king put in order the ways (of
the people in the country) from below to above", "Year Ur-Nammu made
justice in the land").[5]
Among his military
exploits were the conquest of Lagash and the defeat of his former masters at
Uruk. He was eventually recognized as a significant regional ruler (of Ur,
Eridu, and Uruk) at a coronation in Nippur, and is believed to have constructed
buildings at Nippur, Larsa, Kish, Adab, and Umma. He was known for restoring
the roads and general order after the Gutian period.[6]
Ur-Nammu was also
responsible for ordering the construction of a number of ziggurats, including
the Great Ziggurat of Ur.[7]
He was killed in a
battle against the Gutians after he had been abandoned by his army.[6] He was
deified, and succeeded by his son Shulgi.[4] His death in battle was
commemorated in a long Sumerian elegiac composition, "The Death of Ur-
• Site drawings of the temple built by Ur-Nammu
at Ur to the moon god Nanna.
• Nabonidus dedication to the Ziggurat
• The Code of Ur-Nammu at Britannica
• Foundation Figurine of King Ur-Nammu at the
Oriental Institute of Chicago
• The "Ur-Nammu" Stela. Penn Museum.
2006. ISBN 978-1-931707-89-3.
• The face of Ur-Namma. A realistic statue of
Ur-Namma shows us how he may have looked.
• A brief description of the reign of Ur-Namma.
• I am Ur-Namma. The life and death of Ur-Namma,
as told in Babylonian literature.
The ziggurat (and
temple?) of Ur-Nammu
This ziggurat was
erected to the moon god Nanna. It was built by Ur-Nammu at Ur around 2113-2096
B.C. It was composed of three stages. It is not clear whether there was a
temple at the top. The remains of the ziggurat probably stood over an existing
structure going back to the early dynastic period, and restored by the
Neo-Babylonian king Nabonidus (556-539 B.C.). It is the most preserved of all
ziggurats in Mesopotamia and has been partially reconstructed reaching a hight
of 11 m. It stood within a rectangular court 62.5 m x 43 m. at the base. Its
outer faces are of baked brick, are inclined to a pronounced batter and have
regularly spaced, flat buttresses. These outer faces encase the solid core of
mudbricks. Access to the ziggurat was through three converging ramps from where
a central stairway continued to the second stage. The shape of the staircase
leading to the third stage is unclear.
Aerial view:
*****************
The Code of
Hammurabi was one of the only sets of laws in the ancient Near East and also
one of the first forms of law.[12] The code of laws was arranged in orderly
groups, so that all who read the laws would know what was required of them.[13]
Earlier collections of laws include the Code of Ur-Nammu, king of Ur (c. 2050 BC), the Laws of Eshnunna (c. 1930 BC)
and the codex of Lipit-Ishtar of Isin (c. 1870 BC), while later ones include
the Hittite laws, the Assyrian laws, and Mosaic Law.[14] These codes come from
similar cultures in a relatively small geographical area, and they have
passages that resemble each other.[15]
Figures at the top
of the stele "fingernail", above Hammurabi's code of laws.
The Code of
Hammurabi is the longest surviving text from the Old Babylonian period.[16]
The code has been
seen as an early example of a fundamental law, regulating a government – i.e.,
a primitive constitution.[17][18] The code is also one of the earliest examples
of the idea of presumption of innocence, and it also suggests that both the
accused and accuser have the opportunity to provide evidence.[19]
The occasional
nature of many provisions suggests that the code may be better understood as a
codification of Hammurabi's supplementary judicial decisions, and that, by
memorializing his wisdom and justice, its purpose may have been the
self-glorification of Hammurabi rather than a modern legal code or
constitution.
However, its
copying in subsequent generations indicates that it was used as a model of
legal and judicial reasoning.[20]
While the Code of
Hammurabi was trying to achieve equality, biases still existed against those
categorized in the lower end of the social spectrum and some of the punishments
and justice could be gruesome.
The magnitude of
criminal penalties often was based on the identity and gender of both the
person committing the crime and the victim. The Code issues justice following
the three classes of Babylonian society: property owners, freed men, and
slaves.[21]
Punishments for
someone assaulting someone from a lower class were far lighter than if they had
assaulted someone of equal or higher status.[21]
For example, if a
doctor killed a rich patient, he would have his hands cut off, but if he killed
a slave, only financial restitution was required.[22]
Women could also
receive punishments that their male counterparts would not, as men were
permitted to have affairs with their servants and slaves, whereas married women
would be harshly punished for committing adultery.[21]

No comments:
Post a Comment